Tag Archive: philosophy


The weekender

What if we considered our absolute self as only what woke up Sunday mornings?
What if every morning that we woke up for work we immersed into a different self?

I don’t want to be trapped.  The constructive self is hindered by the work self.  The grip on the bridles of creative energy relies on the absence of routine.

The motivated self is the one that moves faster than reason.  It is for that reason I make my stand here.

I want to conceptualize and create in a new medium.  I’m not aware of any medium that exists as of yet that is compatible with my style.  I chose to write because it is the next closest thing.  If I could paint or draw, I believe I could have a close bond with what I’m thinking.

I enjoy writing in that I can choose words that help indicate the appropriate meaning of what I am trying to say, and can construct an archeform that mimics the sentiment as a whole.  I enjoy the blagosphere further because I can actually interrupt conscious thought and type with my fingers without censoring my artist self.

What I want is a new medium.  I want a world where I can think and dream and share my philosophies, like the director of a film, but in a world that cautiously leads the viewer into my own domain, if only for a second at a time.  It doesn’t seem like too much to ask, but I don’t know where to begin.  Creation seems to only work on the creative.

Forward thinking, part 2

It has not gone unnoticed that circumstances that befuddle the imagination and coincidences that produce a superhumorous irony make for a world of innumerable falsities.

The words are here to explain this further, but they do not come easily.  While the thought wraps around my mind I attempt to adapt my neural network to translate it inadequately.

What I mean to say is that suspicion is raised by events that seem to have some sort of destiny to them, and chains of events that ironically lead to an events completion instead of its compromise.  A famous example is the many failed attempts at Hitler’s assassination.  Another example might be the successful assassination of Kennedy.  Presidential security failed him, but do our heroes really require security?  Couldn’t they tempt fate around every corner and be protected by some sort of cosmic duty?  Could there be an event so crucial to the development of our known universe that all the very matter that composes us falters in such a way to create a near miss, or a devastating blow?  David can slay Goliath.  Achilles’s heel will be pierced.  A great evil will continue to wage war despite the number of united nations.

What happens if we become aware of this?  Do we get arrogant and foolish?  Do we unwittingly resign from our position as Hero?  If we command our fate outside the prison of fear, our power is limitless.  We have the power to choose good over evil.  What if that evil is the good?  What if we are the evil?  Then the plane of contest is matched.  When the righteous collide, only death remains as their common bond.

One may imagine that if there were two parties at conflict and neither seemed to back down a conclusion of morality could be met.  If one group wished to not destroy the other, yet this other group refused to negotiate, does that make them the wronger?  How deep does our understanding of nature and humanity go?  Simply because it was stated that man has the right to live, does it make it a universal truth?  Is capital punishment ever just?

Supposing it is, then there is a faith-based judicial system which can justify that an unalienable right has lost its presence in an individual.  Said person is branded as evil or unwanted, and is unforgivable and unrehabilitatable.  There is no higher presence to veto this practice of ours outside of the very immutable time that passes them eagerly.

Supposing it is not, then we’re limited to penalties such as corporal punishment and imprisonment.  Is there a measure to precisely how different this is?  Imprisonment denies the US Constitution’s first amendment.  In light of the media’s trend of spoon-feeding us Mother Earth and preservation, what if humanity is not the vehicle of universal rights and truths?  Surely, after all, humans deserve the reward for protecting the universe…